If one party (defendant) intentionally interferes with another’s (plaintiff’s) contractual relations with a third party, the defendant can be liable for damages in a tort action. This is referred to as “tortious interference” in business law.
In simple terms, a tortious interference claim for damages can be filed by a plaintiff against a defendant who decides to wrongfully interfere with the plaintiff’s business or contractual relationship with another individual or company.
For a plaintiff to prevail in a tortious interference claim, he or she would need to prove the following elements of the claim:
In our experience, tortious interference claims frequently combat wrongful competition or immoral conduct by a former employee. For example, an employee could improperly use a confidential, proprietary data set belonging to a former employer to win the business of a former client of that employer. When a defendant wrongfully interferes with another’s business relationship or economic opportunity, he or she can be held liable for damages.
If you are considering filing a tortious interference claim, please understand that these claims are highly-factual, rely heavily on the evidence, and it will be necessary prove the aforementioned elements of the claim to prevail in court.
The courts generally recognize three members of the “tortious interference family,” including: 1) tortious interference with an existing contract, 2) tortious interference with business relations, and 3) tortious interference with an economic advantage.
If there is no valid contract between the plaintiff and a third party, it can be more difficult to establish the business relationship; however, that does not mean it is impossible.
Some jurisdictions, such as Illinois, are willing to recognize that a defendant interfered with the plaintiff’s “economic advantage” when it can be proven in court.
To establish a claim in the absence of a contract, the plaintiff must show they had “reasonable expectation” of economic advantage, and the defendant knew about it.
The plaintiff would also have to prove the realistic probability that he or she would have received the economic benefit, if it were not for the defendant’s interference.
To learn more about tortious interference in Illinois or Wisconsin, contact our business litigation firm today!
Privacy Policy | Rifkind Patrick LLC | All Rights Reserved. | Created by
Olive + Ash. Managed by
Olive Street Design