Considering the complexity of a construction project and the number of individuals involved, it is no wonder why construction litigation is common in our litigious society.
Legal claims and litigation are frequently associated with construction, but that does not mean that there aren’t things that can be done to reduce unfavorable scenarios, such as delays, disruptions, and additional costs, which can lead to lawsuits.
History has taught us that the players and the projects vary widely, but the disputes themselves do not.
By knowing how and where a conflict can arise, you can plan carefully to reduce the risk of conflict, and if one does surface, you can address it swiftly and effectively.
Construction conflicts can often be traced back to the following:
Owner-Drafted Contracts: In such contracts, the owner uses exculpatory language, as well as waivers and limitations designed to shield the contractor from virtually all claims. These one-sided contracts do not necessarily prevent claims due to their lack of fairness.
Unclear Project Delivery Systems: An unclear project delivery system can blur the traditional responsibilities of the parties involved. Owners should be aware that using a non-traditional contract increases the risk of misunderstanding, especially when aspects, such as the scope of work or the compensation are frequently changing throughout the course of a project.
Poorly-Coordinated Design: If a design is inaccurate or poorly coordinated, it can easily lead to unanticipated costs, delays, and conflicts among parties. One of the best ways to reduce the risk of litigation is to have a complete and accurate design.
The owner who does not give the architect sufficient time to complete a plan and specifications, or adequate compensation for an adequate design can run into unwanted costs and delays. Conversely, fast-track construction increases the risk of litigation.
Site Conditions: Some experts believe that contracts should allow for additional compensation for differing site conditions; this clause protects prudent contractors from competing contractors underbidding them because they were too negligent to include such a reasonable clause.
Contractors know that hidden site conditions can mean the difference between a profitable project and a complete financial loss.
Regardless of the approach towards “site conditions,” the wise landowner will conduct a subsurface investigation so they have a good understanding of the site’s conditions before hiring a contractor. Further, the owner shares the information with the contractor before executing a contract.
We are only scratching the surface in regards to things that should be addressed in a construction contract and what can go wrong. Other factors to consider include site services, site monitoring, determining who is in charge, and subcontractor and supplier submittals, etc.
Construction contracts should be clear so it is easy for all parties to know their responsibilities. Contractors should provide quality work, and architects must provide quality designs.
Owners should pay a fair price for these services in a timely fashion. When these responsibilities are not met, disputes can arise, leading to litigation.
If you are involved in a construction dispute, contact Rifkind Patrick LLC to schedule a free case evaluation. With four decades of collective experience in construction law, we are qualified to help you – call today to get started!
Privacy Policy | Rifkind Patrick LLC | All Rights Reserved. | Created by
Olive + Ash. Managed by
Olive Street Design